|
“Road to Progress
in Southwest Florida”
by Kerry Kirschner, Executive Director
|
|
June
2003
|
newsletter
to the membership
|
Volume
XV
|
“All
day we saw them coming, the trucks and truckers, the caterpillars
and cat-skinners. The foremen and the workmen, the asphalt spreaders
in their dirty black trucks who ate the green with more precision
than the sharpest plow.
They’d
cut straight through the northeast field a month before. The steam
shovel harvest lay there still, bent up cornstalks boulders with
their shins skinned. The hide of the earth split open and quartered.
And now they’d
come to finish off the job to cut our lives up too.
Thinking about
the dogs I’d chased down through the yellow corn, the girls
I’d walked back home along the fence, mostly the smell of
the field, the song of the crows, the rattle of the field mice on
the new turned ground made me stop watching them.
They were harvesters
and spoilers too, no different from the farmer in the next field
down the road.
Tomorrow we’d
start smelling gasoline and diesel smoke as the road came crashing
through.
Mama said, “It’s
just a road.” But she knew too that with the coming of the
road our lives would change, it wouldn’t be the same. And
it wasn’t.”
When Rod McCuen
penned that poem, The Day They Built the Road, he had no
idea how that imagery would be so descriptive of Southwest Florida
over the past 25 years. The construction of Interstate 75 south
from Tampa has been the single most important physical factor to
have changed Southwest Florida over the past quarter century. Isolated
from the urban centers of Tampa and St. Petersburg to the north,
access by road was restricted to U.S. 41, a constricted federal
highway that in some locations still had not been widened past its
original two lanes. Prior to the extensions of I-75, attempts by
companies like General Development to carve cities out of raw land,
adjacent to water and the main highway had failed. Their idea of
developing acreage on the fringes of established cities and building
housing and job opportunity in “self-contained” new
cities was premature at best. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
Having moved with my family from Ohio to this area in 1952, I have
witnessed the change from agrarian small town to the bustling, exploding
urban sprawl of Southwest Florida.
The area south of St. Petersburg, encompassing the cities of Bradenton,
Sarasota, Venice, Punta Gorda, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, and Naples,
began the last half of the 20th century as a sparsely inhabited
coastal region, dependent upon agriculture and the occasional winter
visitor who had lost their way while searching for Miami. That is
not to say that the residents of this area did not plan, or long
to be more like their big city cousin to the southeast Miami. Oh
yes, thanks to Plant and Teddy Roosevelt and the Spanish-American
War we had a railroad that brought initial hope to bring residents
south from Tampa. But it was not until the 1920’s that the
entrepreneurs in the form of John Ringling, Mrs. Potter Palmer,
Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Powell Crosley, and Goodyear became winter
residents that the first signs of large development began to crop
up. Mrs. Potter Palmer bought 1000’s of acres in order to
establish cattle ranching on the scale of Texas. John Ringling also
bought land, but with the thought of creating a destination that
would become the winter White House for the President of the United
States. He built a bridge, subdivided a barrier island into single
family building lots, and created a commercial center that he named
“Harding Circle” in order to entice the then U.S. President
to make St. Armands Key his winter home. Unfortunately, Harding
died the the week before the grand opening of the bridge.
Despite the creation of all the building lots in the 1920’s,
the staple of trade was not land for residency, but for trade. Options
called “binders” were bid up in price while the land
they covered remained in its original unimproved state. Despite
the fact that cities were platted, and lots sold, it was not until
post World War II that the Southwest coast started to come alive.
In fact all Florida started to explode. Florida’s population
grew from 2,771,000 people in 1950 to roughly 4.8 million in 1959,
thanks to in-migration, which is responsible still today for Southwest
Florida’s’ growth. Some may think that today, with a
state population in excess of 15 million that we are no longer dependent
upon in-migration. However, consider this…Sarasota County
recently became the first county in the history of the United States
to have more deaths than births. Not a statistic that bodes well
for the closing of the door to new residents. In fact the marketing
of Southwest Florida through the 1960’s, was almost exclusively
directed towards the retiree. As there were little if any employment
opportunities, most new development depended primarily on retirement,
or permanent income people who brought their pensions, social security,
stocks, bonds, and rental incomes with them. Generally it was felt
that there were enough Americans reaching the age of 65 to be able
to supply Southwest Florida with enough newcomers to fuel all the
economic development that could be handled. Single-family lots were
sold by the 1,000’s. General Development sold close to 100,000
lots in Southwest Florida and reported that the majority of the
owners would build on their lots in five to ten years after purchase.
Today, North Port, just south of Sarasota, still has 55,000 building
lots that have yet to see a home. So what happened? The developers
didn’t do what they had promised – build cities. The
promise that cities would soon take shape, never materialized. The
developers continued to sell lots while the selling was good, but
then the public realized that there was no rush to buy homesites
because the promised cities weren’t being built.
Southwest Florida’s explosive growth over the past twenty
years created a set of combustible problems. The success of real
estate development has simply outgrown everything else including
revenue and creative ideas to deal with what fifty years ago was
an agrarian economy with the occasional winter visitor. Rural developments
are cropping up all along the corridor outside of the traditional
urban centers, in hopes that they will attract jobs and commercial
activity. Government regulation that includes impact fees for everything
from parks, to roads, to schools, as well as imposed “stipulations”
on planned unit developments and most rezonings, have made lot prices
in most areas go beyond the point where builders of middle-priced
homes can absorb them. Where housing developments in rural areas,
away from the pricey waterfront communities were once considered
affordable, they too are now seeing prices for single-family homes
in excess of $1,000,000. All the while the agriculture community,
faced with curtailment of water usage from the water management
districts, storm water fees in excess of ad-valorem taxes, is itchy
to join the development game. Profits on citrus and cattle are down,
and government has forgotten that “greenbelt” was a
recognition that in order to keep farming as a viable occupation
it had to be lenient on taxation. Coupled with agriculture operating
and taxing problems, is the opportunity that the real estate development
players are no longer the small builder and developers, but instead
the large, public building corporations like WCI, Lennar, Toll Brothers,
and the like. The tremendous amount of money needed for construction
and development has necessarily taken the play away from the small
builder and developer, and afforded the large agriculture landholder
the opportunity to cash out quickly. The promise to build cities
broken by the developers of the 1950’s and 1960’s is
not being broken today. Why?
Local government in Southwest Florida has adopted a very stringent
approach to development. Zoning for the most part rather than being
performance based is regulatory to the point where some believe
that rather than having property rights we have established instead
the Socialist Republic of Southwest Florida. Major development is
a process that can take longer in permitting than in construction.
For those participating it is our version of the full employment
act for the legal, planning, and engineering professionals. Let
me give you an idea about the number of agencies to deal with beginning
with local government. First there is the appointed planning board
and elected commission. Next the regional planning council, regional
water management district, state department of transportation, department
of community affairs, environmental affairs, and on and on. Each
agency has a set of rules, promulgated by every incident that went
wrong in the history of development, plus “stipulations.”
My definition of “stipulations” is that they are rules,
thought of too late which can’t be adopted as part of a code,
but if you accept their imposition, it will make things easier in
getting your project approved! Foul you cry! Property rights violation
– blackmail – we’ll sue!!! Ah, “We’ll
sue” - the two words of comfort to the elected official in
southwest Florida in the 21st century. In the first instance you
have confirmed my political integrity by showing that I have not
been bought-off or bullied by the evil development community. Second
as an elected official I have a bottomless checking account available
to me at the First National Bank of the Public Trough. I have no
fiduciary background, or experience, having never signed the front
of a paycheck, so I can now have staff attorneys along with the
judiciary make the decision on whether you have any private property
rights. At election time I can tell the NIMBYS how I fought the
evil empire, and I can tell the development community how some ferret
faced shyster who was head of the government’s legal department
advised me that rather than settle the suit, government should fight
you to the highest court! But rest assured if you contribute money
to my re-election campaign no pasty-faced legal adventurer will
cause bad blood between us ever again. And so without having to
make a decision, I am re-elected, to continue to not make a decision.
And the planned cities continue to be developed. Despite government
making it difficult to develop, the requirement of upfront financial
commitment for infrastructure that was never made of earlier developers
is ensuring that developments today get developed.
And you say, what is different in southwest Florida from the rest
of the country?
In the first instance, we are pushing the farmer out of business.
Land values are escalating past the point where the value of the
land justifies the value of what can be produced. Florida lawmakers
in the just ended legislative session approved a ban on Florida
counties ability to regulate farms, as an appeasement to an ever-growing
chorus of disgruntled farmers. The Florida House of Representatives
passed the bill entitled the “Agricultural Lands and Practices
Act” by a vote of 117-0. It passed the Senate 37-0. Essentially
the bill prohibits counties from regulating any activity of agriculture
that is covered by Federal, state, or water management district
regulation. The counties and environmentalists are up in arms, while
the Farm Bureau feels that county governments only care about urban
amenities and city creation. The range wars have returned, and attorney’s
waiting for the governor to sign the bill, are locking and loading
to fight the constitutional infringement question on whether the
state can usurp so completely the powers of local government. The
bill says that a county “may not exercise any of its powers
to adopt any ordinance, resolution, regulation, rule or policy to
prohibit, restrict, regulate, or otherwise limit an activity of
a bona fide farm operation on agricultural land.” I can see
it now; all new developments will be changing their names to “Marvin’s
Gardens,” “Strawberry Fields Forever,” and “Farmer’s
Dell.” Each homeowner will be given a goat, chicken, and horse
to assure that the agriculture character of development be kept.
No more 500-foot setbacks, tree ordinances, earthmoving ordinances,
and storm-water districts for me. I am bona fide AGRI-CULTURE! Seriously
though, while expenses keep going up for ranching and crops, staying
in business and making a profit are becoming more difficult. As
the urbanization of the rural areas of our coastal communities takes
place it is the beginning of the end for agriculture as a business.
As one large parcel sells it impacts the adjacent lands, as one
by one, these rural lands are converted to residential, commercial,
and industrial properties.
In the second instance, what was once agricultural land is being
turned into “new” cities. With the adoption of stringent
requirements imposed by both the State of Florida and local government
the developers are creating “new” cities because they
are required to provide their own entire infrastructure. In the
meantime the earlier developments that were built in the unincorporated
county areas with no zoning, no central water and sewer, substandard
or never built roads are now becoming the nightmares of government.
As late as the 1980’s County governments felt that their only
responsibility was to control mosquitoes and pay for the sheriff
and his posse. As late as 1988 Sarasota County for example, remained
focused on not providing central utilities and refused to join with
the City of Sarasota to build a regional sewage treatment facility.
By the time that the county officials awoke to the benign neglect
that had taken place from their refusal to deal with infrastructure
that they had never provided, they were faced with polluted bays
and creeks, contaminated potable water wells, and inadequate roads.
When a revelation of this magnitude strikes a political body, its
first order of business is to look for a “bad” guy.
Clearly the bad guy had been development who had responded to market
demands, but did not build the infrastructure. Again rather than
deal with the issue, some counties like Sarasota, decided that in
order to stop this relentless march of development that they would
only allow residential development of five and ten acre lots on
rural land. In Southwest Florida these are called ranches. Still
built with wells and septic systems, some on dirt roads, the counties
added to their problems and have only now begun to recognize that
rather than stopping development it proliferated. And rather than
raise cattle and citrus on these so-called ranches the only thing
that is raised is a cocktail! We call them “martini ranches,”
and based upon the new rules just enacted by the State Legislature
we are about to get more of them. It is just more urban sprawl without
infrastructure. So now begins the catch up. Government is establishing
central water and sewage facilities over vast land areas with not
only purchases and hook-ups of package water and treatment plants,
but also the digging up and replacement of individual septic tanks,
and the shutting down of polluted shallow household wells. The cost
to do this in dollars amount to 100’s of millions. The disruption
to existing neighborhoods is immense.
The lack of adequate road construction in southwest Florida is
even worse. North – South roads that should have been built
are limited. In Collier County which is Naples, they never bothered
to build any North – South local roads and are now left with
the Federal highway of US-41 and I-75 as their only road ways to
go north and south. It is so bad that if there is ever a major hurricane
headed for southwest Florida, that the only hope for evacuation
would be to use all lanes of I-75 going north. Oh, I forgot to tell
you, we couldn’t get to the center of the state or the east
coast either on any multilane roads unless we go to I-4 out of Tampa
or Alligator Alley south of Naples. Until recently we all lived
in the belief that someone, from someplace else, was going to take
care of all this for us. However, we are now waking up to the tremendous
costs that we face in trying to retrofit our communities.
Which leads me back to the creation of cities. With government
spending their energy and attention dealing with the sins of omission
and commission of the past, the new cities that are being created
today are far different from what was built yesterday. All the burden
of infrastructure placed on the developer has changed the face of
community. Beautiful and complete with offices, shopping, golf courses
and other amenities the cost of development leaves few if any housing
units priced under $200,000. The regulatory framework and permitting
process being subject to appeal and collateral attack, together
with environmental and wetlands regulations driving up the cost
of land, leaves new housing availability only accessible to the
most affluent. The rising cost of housing to support an integrated
economy of teachers, service industry personnel and the like is
an ignored threat to the functioning economic and social well being
of what we have traditionally known as “community.”
Moderate-income workers are finding that not only can they not afford
the purchase of a home, even the prospects of rentals in places
like Sarasota and Collier (Naples) counties is out of reach for
many.
In Sarasota and Collier (Naples,) over 50% of the population does
not work, despite the fact that government statistics show these
two communities to be some of the most affluent in the country.
I did a paper a number of years ago referring to the “Tale
of Two Cities” where half the population in Sarasota does
not work and enjoys a high standard of living, thanks to transfer
payments of rents, stocks, and retirement, while the working population
enjoys a standard of living at the same level as the citizens of
Shreveport, Louisiana. In turn the working folks are forced to live
far away from the affluent centers and are forced to commute long
distances to work, adding to an all ready heavily congested road
network. The same tool used for “growth management”
of impact fees, and over regulation by government, has led to a
loss of affordable housing. Long term the prospects for the employees
of a service economy are not good. Without an adequate work force
the prospects of our improving and upgrading our local economy is
not good either, as we continue to export our children to other
markets.
Which brings me full circle to Rod McCuen’s poem The Day
They Built (that damned) Road! In truth, we were poorer then than
we are today. We had less of everything – including cars and
people! But we had one hell of a lot more mosquitoes! We thought
we got along better with one another, until you think back about
how the sheriff escorted the Grand Kluxen of the Klu Klux Klan through
town, and how one of the pillars of the community stole money from
the church offering to bet at the dog track. How Billy Joe grew
up in a house with no running water, nor electricity. How we didn’t
have air conditioning. It does seem that during the last half of
the 20th Century and now during the first half of the 21st that
the constant of Florida is change. That is not to say that some
of the change has been the most constructive to the state or region,
but it doesn’t mean that we have not been eager to roll up
our sleeves with the faith that the future holds something better.
When Florida became a State of this Union, no one expected that
this mosquito-infested swamp would ever amount to much. Sometimes
I shut my eyes in the midst of what surrounds me today, and marvel
at the experiences I have lived through in Southwest Florida. The
good still outweighs the bad. We just have to live with the belief
that if we keep tinkering long enough, that we’ll get it right.
It is our insurmountable opportunity, that keeps us all going in
trying to get things right.
Speech delivered by Kerry Kirschner to the American Bar
Association, State & Local Government Law Section, 2003 Spring
Section Meeting, May 10, 2003, Don Cesar Beach
Resort and Spa, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida
Community Vision and Trust
As we embark on a summer of community debate over details of the
2050 Plan, land development regulations, including sign regulations
and architectural review board, noise ordinances, golf course regulations,
and a Downtown Master Plan, let us all pause and reflect on the
purpose of our efforts. As we debate the details of each of the
above issues, let us not lose sight of our community vision, and
our diversity. Our efforts, if succesful, should result in a community
where the needs of everyone are fairly considered. To do that requires
flexibility and mutual trust - two attributes that in the recent
past that have been sorely missing from our community agenda. In
reflecting on our past, rules and regulations have not been able
to “fix” all of our problems nor will they in the future.
Alternative visions, be they landscape buffers as opposed to architectural
control, density bonuses for affordable housing as opposed to mandated
price controls, are the kinds of thinking that might better resolve
our community challenges. Just maybe, if we give vision and trust
a try, we all might be pleasantly surprised!
|
|