|
Is
Majority Opinion Hurting Us?
|
|
May,
2002
|
newsletter
to the membership
|
Volume
XIV
|
In our 21st century all inclusive, information filled world, more
and more we are finding that majority opinion, when based upon the
misrepresentation of facts, is leading us down a path that is harmful
to both our personal financial and civic health. In our financial
lives we have seen how the touting of "DOT.COMS", and purported
gurus of Wall Street have led us down a slippery slope of financial
chicanery. In our civic life we have been blessed with self-anointed
seers as the protectors of our quality of life, loosely distorting
facts to the point that no intellectual debate can take place. Modern
day Merlin's have convinced many that hordes of humanity are destroying
Sarasota and its surroundings, and only through draconian governmental
regulation will we be able to save our little corner of paradise.
The fact is that problems can no more be solved correctly by majority
opinion than can a problem in mathematics. If truth be of interest,
we would be better off if we returned to a time where we solved our
problems based upon undistorted facts without resorting to manipulated
popular opinion.
In preparation
for an Argus Foundation Strategic Planning meeting, I found some
facts about land use, both nationally and locally, that formatted
into a multiple choice quiz, were presented in order to demonstrate
how little we know about the "truth" of development, in
a community where we have more experts on development than we have
mosquitoes. Here is a sample of the questions in my quiz. See how
many you can answer correctly.
1. How much land is currently "developed" in the
US?
| A.
5% |
B.
10% |
C.
15% |
D.
25% |
F.
75% |
2. How much total developed land in the US is "Urbanized?"
| A.
1/4 |
B.
1/3 |
C.
1/2 |
D.
3/4 |
3. How much of total US cropland was converted to developed
land between 1992-1997?
| A.
10% |
B.
15% |
C.
25% |
D.
30% |
E.
50% |
4. What proportion of Atlanta's population represents "new
resident" growth since 1980?
| A.
10% |
B.
25% |
C.
40% |
D.
60% |
E.
75% |
5. Since 1990 average residential lot sizes in US have.
A. Increased by 10%
B. Increased by 15%
C. Have stayed the same
D. Decreased by 10%
E. Decreased by 15%
6. From 1990-2000 what city with population over 50,000 in
the state of Florida grew the slowest?
A. Cape Coral
B. Daytona Beach
C. Jacksonville
D. Sarasota
E. Largo
7. What city in the US is most like the City of Sarasota,
based upon density of population per square mile?
A. Dallas
B. Bangor, ME
C. Jacksonville
D. West Palm Beach
E. Union City, NJ
8. Match the rates of population growth between 1990 to 2000
to the appropriate counties of Southwest Florida.
| Collier |
+ 34.96%
|
| Lee |
+ 65.27
|
| Charlotte |
+31.56
|
| Desoto |
+27.62%
|
| Sarasota |
+17.35%
|
| Manatee |
+ 24.70%
|
9. Out
of 3,141 counties in the US where does Sarasota County rank in rate
of growth between 1990 and 2000?
| A.
3012 |
B.
91 |
C.
791 |
D.
580 |
E.
1569 |
10.
Between 1990 and 2000 what county in Florida grew at a similar rate
to Sarasota?
A. Orange
B. Duval
C. Dixie
D. Escambia
E. Holmes
Well, how did you do? Probably, like all of us, you did not score
100! What everyone can probably agree on, is you can't go waving
any of these statistics around and come to a conclusion that our
population growth in Sarasota is out of control. The City of Sarasota
had the slowest actual population growth of any city over 50,000
people in the state of Florida over the past ten years, adding a
total of 1,754 people to its population of 50,961, while Sarasota
County had the slowest percentage rate of growth of any county on
the West Coast of Florida. While some politicians want to reduce
density, the City of Sarasota has a density per square mile of 3.540
similar to that of Dallas, but less than the 5,000 per square mile
of Bangor, Maine. Jacksonville has 971 people per square mile, while
West Palm Beach has 1.489 people. In isolation do those numbers
mean anything to you when you stop to consider the character of
each community? On the other hand if you were to tell me that you
did not want to live with the same density per square mile as that
of Union City, New Jersey, 52,972 per square mile, I would understand.
Certainly nobody wants to see run away growth not supported by infrastructure,
but can we not stop this unfounded hysteria that saps our economic
vitality and imposes unreasonable restraints by local government
on responsible, market driven investment?
The Argus Foundation
opposition to the Downtown Master Plan, supported by the commercial
builders, and downtown property owners is a clarion call that asks
government to recognize that over the past 15 years there has been
no commercial office space development in downtown Sarasota, and
once again, rather than moving toward a downtown of greater vitality,
we are headed now in the opposite direction.
For the years
1996 to 1999 downtown office space vacancy hovered between 3% and
5%. Today downtown office space vacancy is over 10% as rumors circulate
that more office space will be vacated as tenants move to Lakewood
Ranch, Jacaranda, and other outlying locations. The City of Sarasota
after two years of negotiation to partner with the private sector
at Palm Avenue to build needed public parking has abandoned the
project for a second time. The cavalier reasoning of "negotiations
being difficult," and "failure to meet" an arbitrary
city deadline, is followed by whimsical dreamings that "the
third time will be a charm." Like the shadows in Plato's cave,
we have come to accept as our reality that the world will keep beating
a path to our door regardless of how they are being treated. Unrecognized
business flight by those that say they want more affordable housing,
better wages, business support for the arts and social services,
fails to take into account the fact that their embracing the popular
opinion that we must stop rampant growth is leading to more flight
and less investment. As long as we do not despoil our natural environment,
there will always be people who regardless of cost will want residential
housing in Sarasota. To the contrary, those who are in business
are required to make a profit. When the cost of doing business,
(overheads, taxes, regulatory burdens, etc.,) prevents business
from making a profit, regardless of how nice the community might
be, business is forced to go elsewhere.
If we really
want an integrated economy in Sarasota, we better regain our equilibrium
to recognize the facts necessary to attain that goal.
If we are not
careful the history of Sarasota will be written on the folly of
misguided majority opinion. To those who have dismissed Argus and
reasoned voices of the business community as crazy and only self-serving,
you need to pay attention. One of us is likely to be wrong, and
you better find out which one it is. The end result makes an awfully
big difference to the future and the history of Sarasota.
ANSWERS
BACK TO ARCHIVE
Is Majority
Opinion Hurting Us?
May, 2002 newsletter to the membership Volume XIII, No. 2
In our 21st century all inclusive, information filled world, more
and more we are finding that majority opinion, when based upon the
misrepresentation of facts, is leading us down a path that is harmful
to both our personal financial and civic health. In our financial
lives we have seen how the touting of "DOT.COMS", and
purported gurus of Wall Street have led us down a slippery slope
of financial chicanery. In our civic life we have been blessed with
self-anointed seers as the protectors of our quality of life, loosely
distorting facts to the point that no intellectual debate can take
place. Modern day Merlin's have convinced many that hordes of humanity
are destroying Sarasota and its surroundings, and only through draconian
governmental regulation will we be able to save our little corner
of paradise. The fact is that problems can no more be solved correctly
by majority opinion than can a problem in mathematics. If truth
be of interest, we would be better off if we returned to a time
where we solved our problems based upon undistorted facts without
resorting to manipulated popular opinion.
1. Only 5% of
the land in the United States is developed, with the most urbanized
state being New Jersey with one-third (33%) of this land developed.
So despite the claim that we are running out of land, in America,
the majority of our land is rural and in open space.
Source: U.S.D.A. National Resources
Inventory
2. 3/4 of all developed land is urbanized
Source: U.S.D.A. National Resources
Inventory
3. 15% - If the truth be known most cropland is being converted
into parks and open space. You don't have to look past the boundaries
of Sarasota County where over 30% of the land is in, or will be
soon, public ownership.
Source: U.S.D.A. National Resources
Inventory
4. Atlanta had a population growth rate between 1980-2000 of 75%.
If you combine births, deaths, and net migration - 3/4 of metro
Atlanta's population is new.
Source: U.S. Census 2000
5. Lot size has decreased by 10% - rather than using more land for
housing we are using less.
Source: National Association of Home
Builders
6. Sarasota. In cities over 50,000 - out of 601 cities in the US
with populations over 50,000, Sarasota ranks number 463 in rate
of growth over the past ten years. That translates to a growth rate
of 3.4% over a ten-year period of time, or a rate of three tenths
of a percent per year!
Sources: Demographia
7. Dallas
Source: Demographia
8. Collier-B; Lee-C; Charlotte-D; Sarasota-E; Manatee-F; Desoto-A;
Source: Demographia
9. 791
Source: Demographia
10. Holmes
Source: Demographia
|